HML method for choosing hearing protection

E-A-R Classic HML data

E-A-R Classic HML data

Safety people love acronyms as it makes us feel special, special like our mums' always told us we were. So HML, or 'High, Medium and Low'. This is the middle way, a bit better than the SNR route but not as good as the octave band route. HML breaks the sound into three frequency ranges and gives you a level of noise reduction for each. 

H (high) - 2000 to 8000Hz
M (medium) - 1000 to 2000Hz
L (low) - 63 to 1000Hz 

So as an example, the hearing protector may say on the pack ‘HML 32,27, 21’, and these are the dB reductions for each of those frequencies.

To use HML to assess hearing protectors you need a couple of measurements for the noise in question, the A weighted noise level and the C weighted noise level, these are the average dB(A) and dB(C) figures. Please be sure not to use the peak dB(C) - a subtle but important difference. So, to get the measurement for this you use a good noise meter that gives you average noise levels for the job in question in both dB(A) and dB(C).

Next you look at your desired hearing protector and somewhere on the packaging will probably be HML data, or maybe in the leaflet which comes inside it. If it is not there then check the Hearing Protection Performance Data on this site were HML is listed for 200+ types of protector. 

Optime II muff

As a worked example, this here jobby to the right is the Peltor Optime II ear muff and 'tis indeed a good style of muff. The HML figures on the packaging for this are: 

H-34dB, M-29d, L-20dB

So you have your noise measurement and you have the HML data for the muff, so now you need to do some magic calculations to determine if the muff is good enough, after all it is clearly very powerful at the high frequencies (the H of 34dB) but less so at the lower ones (the 20dB). This is normal for most hearing protection as the lower frequencies are harder to stop, and most noise sources are higher up the scale.

Here is the formula to use..

HML Calculations.png

Get the calculator out and off you go…

Don't be bloody daft - unless you are some kind of maths nerd what you definitely don't do is go and do this HML calculation yourself as there are free resources online to do this for you.

Even allowing 4dB for incorrect use, this protector is suitable for the risk, using HML to calculate it.

Even allowing 4dB for incorrect use, this protector is suitable for the risk, using HML to calculate it.

This is how the calculation looks using a noise exposure calculator, and taking example noise data of 91dB(A) and 104 dB(C).

As you can see, the calculator is nice and easy - just pop the HML numbers in alongside your dB(A) and dB(C) values and it tells you that the result under the ear muff is 78dB allowing for small real-world wearer-errors such as hair or glasses interfering with the seal. 

78dB is just about perfect for under-the-protector levels so the muff is suitable for this job, indeed is nigh-on ideal.

If you don't have a noise meter which can do octave band measurements then HML is the next best and helps you decide if the hearing protection you are looking at is up to the job.

For a calculator - the one I always use is online at - noise calculator, or if you want to download one then the Health and Safety Executive have a free noise calculator available to download.